http://simpsonsparadox.com/2009/01/repeating-decimals.html Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:17:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 http://simpsonsparadox.com/2009/01/repeating-decimals.html/comment-page-1#comment-4986 bethie Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:46:43 +0000 http://simpsonsparadox.com/?p=1321#comment-4986 hahahahahaha that's funny. hahahahahaha that’s funny.

]]> http://simpsonsparadox.com/2009/01/repeating-decimals.html/comment-page-1#comment-4969 Wabres Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:16:01 +0000 http://simpsonsparadox.com/?p=1321#comment-4969 Well, that explains things somewhat. Well, that explains things somewhat.

]]> http://simpsonsparadox.com/2009/01/repeating-decimals.html/comment-page-1#comment-4950 Meg Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:02:24 +0000 http://simpsonsparadox.com/?p=1321#comment-4950 I just realized why you said that! I think my autotag tagged it "pi" 'cause I used "ip" in the post! Autotag is really helpful but it also searched every post where I said "American food" or "America" or even "Erica" and gave it the tag "Eric" I just realized why you said that! I think my autotag tagged it “pi” ’cause I used “ip” in the post! Autotag is really helpful but it also searched every post where I said “American food” or “America” or even “Erica” and gave it the tag “Eric”

]]> http://simpsonsparadox.com/2009/01/repeating-decimals.html/comment-page-1#comment-4948 Meg Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:31:25 +0000 http://simpsonsparadox.com/?p=1321#comment-4948 Actually I said 42 and a third, although pi would have been funnier. Actually I said 42 and a third, although pi would have been funnier.

]]> http://simpsonsparadox.com/2009/01/repeating-decimals.html/comment-page-1#comment-4946 bethie Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:39:50 +0000 http://simpsonsparadox.com/?p=1321#comment-4946 Pi's not a repeating decimal! Pi’s not a repeating decimal!

]]>